RE: [PATCH 1/1] tty: n_gsm: fix encoding of control signal octet bit DV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > All of these are patch 1/1, which is odd :(
> > > 
> > > Please renumber them properly and resend.
> > 
> > All these patches are based on the current version of tty-next and are 
> > completely independent from each other. The only common part is the 
> > file they apply to. Therefore, this is not a patch series. Would you 
> > still suggest to apply a different numbering?
> 
> Yes, please send them as a patch series, numbered correctly, as a whole
> series of patches, all listed as 1/1 does not do good things for our
> tools.

I have noticed that all patches have been sent in one thread. This was not
my intention. I see two options here now:
1. Resend all patches one by one as they are completely independent.
2. Create a patch series.

And the following two variants in case of option 2:
a. Just renumber the subjects and resend all (i.e. without a cover letter).
b. Create a patch series from commits that depend on each other. Send this
   together with a cover letter.

Please let me know what you prefer.

With best regards,
Daniel Starke




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux