On 13. 02. 22, 23:27, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
Several drivers that support setting the RS485 configuration via userspace
implement on or more of the following tasks:
- in case of an invalid RTS configuration (both RTS after send and RTS on
send set or both unset) fall back to enable RTS on send and disable RTS
after send
- nullify the padding field of the returned serial_rs485 struct
- copy the configuration into the uart port struct
- limit RTS delays to 100 ms
Move these tasks into the serial core to make them generic and to provide
a consistent beheviour among all drivers.
Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index 846192a7b4bf..3fab4070359c 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -1282,8 +1282,21 @@ static int uart_set_rs485_config(struct uart_port *port,
if (copy_from_user(&rs485, rs485_user, sizeof(*rs485_user)))
return -EFAULT;
+ /* pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
+ if (!(rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
+ !(rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) {
+ rs485.flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+ rs485.flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
+ }
+ /* clamp the delays to [0, 100ms] */
+ rs485.delay_rts_before_send = min(rs485.delay_rts_before_send, 100U);
+ rs485.delay_rts_after_send = min(rs485.delay_rts_after_send, 100U);
Why is this magic 100? Can we have that number somehow documented? You
should define a macro for that anyway.
+ memset(rs485.padding, 0, sizeof(rs485.padding));
What is this memset good for?
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
ret = port->rs485_config(port, &rs485);
+ if (!ret)
+ port->rs485 = rs485;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
if (ret)
return ret;
thanks,
--
js
suse labs