On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:38:01PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 12:13:06PM +0100, Tomasz Moń wrote: > > On 04.01.2022 11:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Why can't you do this dynamically based on the baud rate so as to always > > > work properly for all speeds without increased delays for slower ones? > > > > Could you please advise on which baud rates to consider as slow? Does it > > sound good to have the old trigger level for rates up to and including > > 115200 and the new one for faster ones? > > You tell me, you are the one seeing this issue and are seeing delays on > slower values with your change. Do some testing to see where the curve > is. Maybe it's more sensible to make this even more dynamic: e.g. keep it at 1 as default and increase the water level when a certain irq frequency is reached? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
