On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 7:16 AM Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> > --- > > This is a resend of the following, but as a separate patch. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/YcCisM3BqM984k%2F1@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > index 6e04e3848261..1f482e166467 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ properties: > - items: > - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart > - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > + - items: > + - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > + - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart It doesn't really make sense that imx8qm and imx8dxl are backwards compatible with imx8qxp, but only imx8qm is backwards compatible to imx7ulp. Ir only makes sense if some feature/quirk specific to fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart is gone in imx8qm. Rob
