On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:58:46PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 21-12-17 17:59:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:48:14PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > > index fa23c60a01d0..ee37aa125c86 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > > @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties: > > > - items: > > > - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart > > > - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > > + - items: > > > + - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart > > > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > > + - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart > > > > Why is "- items:" listed twice here? > > There are actually 3 "- items:" and there is a "oneOf:" > that encloses all of these. > > Unfortunately, there are special cases within the driver > that forces the devicetree nodes to have a different list of > compatibles for almost each SoC. Ah. Can you resend it as it is long-gone from my queue now. thanks, greg k-h
