On 13-12-21, 14:29, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 13-12-21, 08:51, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi, Vinod, > > > > On 12/13/21 10:07 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > > > On 25-11-21, 11:00, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > > >> So that we don't use the same desc over and over again. > > > > > > Please use full para in the changelog and not a continuation of the > > > patch title! > > > > Ok, will add a better commit description. Here and in other patches where > > your comment applies. > > Great! > > > > > > > and why is wrong with using same desc over and over? Any benefits of not > > > doing so? > > > > Not wrong, but if we move the free desc to the tail of the list, then the > > sequence of descriptors is more track-able in case of debug. You would > > know which descriptor should come next and you could easier catch > > concurrency over descriptors for example. I saw virt-dma uses > > list_splice_tail_init() as well, I found it a good idea, so I thought to > > follow the core driver. > > Okay, I would be good to add this motivation in the change log. I am > sure after few you would also wonder why you did this change :) Also, pls submit serial patches to Greg separately. I guess he saw the title and overlooked those... -- ~Vinod
