On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:41:18AM +0000, Sherry Sun wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: 2021年11月23日 15:42 > > To: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-linux-imx <linux- > > imx@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: imx: clear RTSD status before suspend > > > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 03:03:49PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote: > > > From: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Clear RTSD status before suspend due to the port also use RTS pin as > > > wakeup source, need to clear the flag first. > > > > I'd write: > > > > Clear RTSD status before enabling the irq event for RTSD. > > Thanks for the suggestion, I will reorganize the commit message and send V2. > > > > > That this happens in the context of suspend isn't that important. > > Sorry I didn't get the point here, can you please explain more? > Per my understanding, the wakeup source interrupt is handled in the > suspend context, so clear the flag in the suspend context is also > necessary. But the actual problem is that RTSD is enabled without first clearing it and not that RTSD isn't cleared in suspend. So my initial reaction after reading the commit log header "clear RTSD status before suspend" was: WTH, why do we need clearing RTSD before suspend. Shouldn't the RTSD state kept over suspend? In contrast clearing an event before the respecive irq is enabled is more obviously correct. And if the irq source is enabled as part of suspend or open isn't that relevant for the subject line. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
