On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:14:23AM +0000, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 11/15/21 5:58 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 04:30:04PM +0200, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > >> dma_cookie_t < 0 indicates an error code, check for it. > > > > Very odd changelog text, please be more descriptive about what is > > happening here. > > > > The tx_submit() method of struct dma_async_tx_descriptor is entitled to do > sanity checks and return errors if encountered. It's not the case for the > DMA controller drivers that this client is using (at_h/xdmac), because they > currently don't do sanity checks and always return a positive cookie at > tx_submit() method. In case the controller drivers will implement sanity > checks and return errors, print a message so that the client will be informed > that something went wrong at tx_submit() level. > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 10 ++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c > >> index 2c99a47a2535..376f7a9c2868 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c > >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c > >> @@ -1004,6 +1004,11 @@ static void atmel_tx_dma(struct uart_port *port) > >> desc->callback = atmel_complete_tx_dma; > >> desc->callback_param = atmel_port; > >> atmel_port->cookie_tx = dmaengine_submit(desc); > >> + if (dma_submit_error(atmel_port->cookie_tx)) { > >> + dev_err(port->dev, "dma_submit_error %d\n", > >> + atmel_port->cookie_tx); > >> + return; > > > > What can a user do with this error message? > > > will be informed that something went wrong at tx_submit() level. > > > Have you seen this happen in real life? > > No. I debugged a locking problem and I observed that dma_submit_error() is not called, > so I thought to update this. > > > > > What commit does this "fix"? > > This is rather an improvement, but if you're looking for a fixes tag, I think > we can use: > Fixes: 08f738be88bb ("serial: at91: add tx dma support") > > I'll send a v2 as part of a bigger series. If you find this patch does not worth it, > I can as well drop it. Please resend it because as-is, I can not take it. thanks, greg k-h