On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:14:15AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Since commit a9c3f68f3cd8d (tty: Fix low_latency BUG) in 2014, > tty_flip_buffer_push() is only a wrapper to tty_schedule_flip(). All > users were converted, so remove tty_flip_buffer_push() completely. Did you consider inlining tty_flip_buffer_push() or unexporting tty_schedule_flip() instead? The name tty_flip_buffer_push() is arguable more descriptive since the work may already be running and is also less tied to the implementation. The ratio of drivers using tty_flip_buffer_push() over tty_schedule_flip() is also something like 186 to 15 so that would amount to a lot less churn too. Also, can you please start adding cover letters to your series to provide an overview of what it is you're trying to accomplish? Johan
