Hi, On 26.06.21 at 05:41, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 25. 06. 21, 13:21, Lino Sanfilippo wrote: >> Thats right, the logic has slightly changed. I thought this does not matter as long as >> we make sure that exactly one of both ON_SEND or AFTER_SEND is set. > > I actually don't know. But I would remain consistent with other drivers. > >> We can stick with the logic >> in serial8250_em485_config() (i.e. always set ON_SEND and delete AFTER_SEND in case >> of an invalid setting), but I think this will require more than the four lines that we >> have now (especially if we want to avoid the !!). > > What if you used only a single !? > You are right, this is the easiest way to keep the current logic. I will do that. Thanks, Lino
