On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:56:04AM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:18:31AM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:27:21PM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
> > > This property ties SIRQ polarity to SCU register bits that don't
> > > necessarily have any direct relationship to it; the only use of it
> > > was removed in commit c82bf6e133d30e0f9172a20807814fa28aef0f67.
> >
> > Please write that as:
> > c82bf6e133d3 ("ARM: aspeed: g5: Do not set sirq polarity")
> >
>
> Ack, will do.
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > What changed from previous versions? That always goes below the ---
> > line.
> >
>
> I included an overview of that in the cover letter (https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/20210402182724.20848-1-zev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/);
> is it desirable to also have that duplicated in the individual patches in
> the series?
Any reason why you didn't include all of the relevant people and mailing
lists in that cover letter? I've never seen it before :)
But yes, if you do send it to the right group, putting it in 00/XX is
fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
