In commit 5ba127878722, we shuffled with the check of 'perm'. But my
brain somehow inverted the condition in 'do_unimap_ioctl' (I thought
it is ||, not &&), so GIO_UNIMAP stopped working completely.
Move the 'perm' checks back to do_unimap_ioctl and do them right again.
In fact, this reverts this part of code to the pre-5ba127878722 state.
Except 'perm' is now a bool.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
Fixes: 5ba127878722 ("vt_ioctl: move perm checks level up")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
index 0a33b8ababe3..2321775ef098 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static int vt_io_fontreset(struct console_font_op *op)
}
static inline int do_unimap_ioctl(int cmd, struct unimapdesc __user *user_ud,
- struct vc_data *vc)
+ bool perm, struct vc_data *vc)
{
struct unimapdesc tmp;
@@ -557,9 +557,11 @@ static inline int do_unimap_ioctl(int cmd, struct unimapdesc __user *user_ud,
return -EFAULT;
switch (cmd) {
case PIO_UNIMAP:
+ if (!perm)
+ return -EPERM;
return con_set_unimap(vc, tmp.entry_ct, tmp.entries);
case GIO_UNIMAP:
- if (fg_console != vc->vc_num)
+ if (!perm && fg_console != vc->vc_num)
return -EPERM;
return con_get_unimap(vc, tmp.entry_ct, &(user_ud->entry_ct),
tmp.entries);
@@ -639,10 +641,7 @@ static int vt_io_ioctl(struct vc_data *vc, unsigned int cmd, void __user *up,
case PIO_UNIMAP:
case GIO_UNIMAP:
- if (!perm)
- return -EPERM;
-
- return do_unimap_ioctl(cmd, up, vc);
+ return do_unimap_ioctl(cmd, up, perm, vc);
default:
return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
--
2.29.1
