Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:36:17AM +0530, shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Vivado has a configurationo for selecting the flow control.
>
> Vivado is ?
>
> > Add a dt binding to check for the same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns,uart.txt | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns,uart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns,uart.txt
> > index 227bb77..5161a05 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns,uart.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/cdns,uart.txt
> > @@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ Required properties:
> > See ../clocks/clock-bindings.txt for details.
> >
> >
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- xlnx,nortscts: The presence of this property indicates that the
> > + UART does not support modem lines for RTS/CTS hardware flow control.
>
> We already have 'uart-has-rtscts'. Please use that. Maybe you need a new
> compatible as I'd guess current users assume RTS/CTS is present.
>
Current behavior is it is with 'uart-has-rtscts . However to keep
backward compatibility.
I added nortscts .
Let me know if we can tackle that or can we change the default behavior?
> > +
> > Example:
> > uart@e0000000 {
> > compatible = "cdns,uart-r1p8";
> > --
> > 2.1.1
> >
>
