On 31-08-20, 16:39, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 28-08-20, 11:37, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This cleans up some of the user code around calls to > > dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(). > > > > All the patches can be picked by respective maintainers directly except > > for the last patch, which needs the previous two to get merged first. > > > > These are based for 5.9-rc1. > > > Viresh Kumar (8): > > cpufreq: imx6q: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > drm/lima: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > drm/msm: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > spi: spi-geni-qcom: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > spi: spi-qcom-qspi: Unconditionally call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > tty: serial: qcom_geni_serial: Unconditionally call > > dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() > > qcom-geni-se: remove has_opp_table > > During testing by some of the Linaro folks on linux-next, we found out > that there was a bug in the OPP core (which makes the kernel crash in > some corner cases with these patches) for which I have sent a fix > today which should be part of 5.9-rc4: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/922ff0759a16299e24cacfc981ac07914d8f1826.1598865786.git.viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Please apply the patches over rc4 only once it comes out (I will > confirm by that time once the patch gets merged). Else you guys can > provide your Ack and I can take the patches through OPP tree. The fix got merged in 5.9-rc4, please apply the patches from this series in your trees and base them on rc4. Thanks. -- viresh
