Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_fsl: Add ACPI support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 08:59:35PM +0530, kuldip dwivedi wrote:
> This adds support for ACPI enumerated FSL 16550 UARTs.

Why?  We need more information here than just this, please.

> 
> Signed-off-by: kuldip dwivedi <kuldip.dwivedi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_fsl.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 131 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_fsl.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_fsl.c
> index 0d0c80905c58..49e5987e538b 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_fsl.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_fsl.c
> @@ -1,24 +1,50 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+

Why are you changing the license of this file?  Are you _SURE_ you are
allowed to do that?

> +//
> +// Freescale 16550 UART "driver"
> +//
> +// Copyright (C) 2011 Paul Gortmaker.
> +// Copyright 2020 NXP
> +// Copyright 2020 Puresoftware Ltd
> +//
> +// This isn't a full driver; it just provides an alternate IRQ
> +// handler to deal with an errata.  Everything else is just
> +// using the bog standard 8250 support.
> +//
> +// We follow code flow of serial8250_default_handle_irq() but add
> +// a check for a break and insert a dummy read on the Rx for the
> +// immediately following IRQ event.
> +//
> +// We re-use the already existing "bug handling" lsr_saved_flags
> +// field to carry the "what we just did" information from the one
> +// IRQ event to the next one.

/* */ is nicer for file headers, please.

> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
>  #include <linux/serial_reg.h>
>  #include <linux/serial_8250.h>
>  
> +
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>

Why the extra blank lines here?  And why asm/ ?  what do you need from
that?

> +
>  #include "8250.h"
>  
> -/*
> - * Freescale 16550 UART "driver", Copyright (C) 2011 Paul Gortmaker.
> - *
> - * This isn't a full driver; it just provides an alternate IRQ
> - * handler to deal with an errata.  Everything else is just
> - * using the bog standard 8250 support.
> - *
> - * We follow code flow of serial8250_default_handle_irq() but add
> - * a check for a break and insert a dummy read on the Rx for the
> - * immediately following IRQ event.
> - *
> - * We re-use the already existing "bug handling" lsr_saved_flags
> - * field to carry the "what we just did" information from the one
> - * IRQ event to the next one.
> - */
> +#define DRIVER_NAME "fsl-ns16550-uart"
> +
> +struct fsl8250_data {
> +	int			line;
> +};
>  
>  int fsl8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
> @@ -79,3 +105,92 @@ int fsl8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *port)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsl8250_handle_irq);
> +
> +static int fsl8250_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct fsl8250_data *data;
> +	struct uart_8250_port port8250;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct resource *regs;
> +
> +	int ret, irq;
> +
> +	regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!regs) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "no registers defined\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		if (irq != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(dev, "cannot get irq\n");
> +		return irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(&port8250, 0, sizeof(port8250));
> +
> +	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "clock-frequency",
> +					&port8250.port.uartclk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&port8250.port.lock);
> +
> +	port8250.port.mapbase		= regs->start;
> +	port8250.port.irq		= irq;
> +	port8250.port.handle_irq	= fsl8250_handle_irq;
> +	port8250.port.type		= PORT_16550A;
> +	port8250.port.flags		= UPF_SHARE_IRQ | UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF
> +						| UPF_FIXED_PORT | UPF_IOREMAP
> +						| UPF_FIXED_TYPE;
> +	port8250.port.dev		= dev;
> +	port8250.port.mapsize		= resource_size(regs);
> +	port8250.port.iotype		= UPIO_MEM;
> +	port8250.port.irqflags		= IRQF_SHARED;
> +
> +	port8250.port.membase = devm_ioremap(dev,  port8250.port.mapbase,
> +						port8250.port.mapsize);
> +	if (!port8250.port.membase)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	data->line = serial8250_register_8250_port(&port8250);
> +	if (data->line < 0)
> +		ret = data->line;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int fsl8250_acpi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct fsl8250_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	serial8250_unregister_port(data->line);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id fsl8250_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{ "NXP0018", 0 },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, fsl8250_acpi_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver fsl8250_platform_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name			= "fsl-16550-uart",
> +		.acpi_match_table	= ACPI_PTR(fsl8250_acpi_match),
> +	},
> +	.probe			= fsl8250_acpi_probe,
> +	.remove			= fsl8250_acpi_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(fsl8250_platform_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("FSL 8250 serial port driver");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" DRIVER_NAME);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Are you _sure_ this will work properly with the build system?  You are
turning an individual file into a stand-alone module, but you didn't
touch any build files.

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux