On Wed 2020-08-19 10:52:09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/08/18 14:52), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > I guess we may add some tags here
> > >
> > > Fixes: 768aec0b5bcc ("serial: 8250: fix shared interrupts issues with SMP and RT kernels")
> > > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reported-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > BugLink: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1114800
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHQZ30BnfX+gxjPm1DUd5psOTqbyDh4EJE=2=VAMW_VDafctkA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> >
> > "Link:" tag should point to the mail that is applied using git am.
> > I am not sure if there is a tag for related discussion in another
> > mail threads.
>
> Yes, that's a good point. I wonder if we can slightly change that
> rule. That link points to a thread where we discussed various
> approaches to the problem, what would work, what wouldn't and why;
> there is some valuable feedback there. The "8250-fix-locks-v2.patch"
> link, on the other hand, points to nothing valuable.
I agree that the other link is more valuable than the final one.
I just did not want to break a common rule. But it seems that
there already are commits with more Link: tags.
> > Sounds reasonable to me.
> >
> > Andy proposed many changes. Sergey, could you please send v2?
>
> Sure, I think I sent v2 already.
Ah, I have missed it. It is pushed now.
Best Regards,
Petr
