Re: [PATCH 1/1] tty: serial: owl: Initialize lock before registering port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:58:06PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:35:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:05:49PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:

...

> > But I think we now have a core fix for this, no need to do this in any
> > individual driver, right?  Can you test my tty-linus branch to see if
> > your change is still needed or not?
> 
> I was not aware of the alternative approach, at that time Andy
> confirmed the expected behaviour is to have a proper initialization
> of the spinlock in the driver:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHp75Vcz0a87LSnb6Ubt5_bSF3wUcs21GbP119trXER5KBDxbQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHp75Vf8xJ2yX-11JsTDnRvZQOK+16aePcB1AUzq=5oO-mFCGQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> I have just checked the tty-linus tree and the only related change
> seems to be f743061a85f5
> ("serial: core: Initialise spin lock before use in uart_configure_port()")
> 
> I tested it on top of 5.8.0-rc4 and I confirm it fixes the splat,

Thank you for the testing!

> however I'm a bit confused now regarding the recommended approach since
> there is at least one more commit in the tty-linux tree that still 
> handles a similar issue in the driver specific code:
> f38278e9b810 ("serial: sh-sci: Initialize spinlock for uart console")

They now should be reverted.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux