Re: [PATCH] tty: xilinx_uartps: Really fix id assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 09:48:53AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> The problems started with the revert (18cc7ac8a28e28). The
> cdns_uart_console.index is statically assigned -1. When the port is
> registered, Linux assigns consecutive numbers to it. It turned out that
> when using ttyPS1 as console, the index is not updated as we are reusing
> the same cdns_uart_console instance for multiple ports. When registering
> ttyPS0, it gets updated from -1 to 0, but when registering ttyPS1, it
> already is 0 and not updated.
> 
> That led to 2ae11c46d5fdc4. It assigns the index prior to registering
> the uart_driver once. Unfortunately, that ended up breaking the
> situation where the probe order does not match the id order. When using
> the same device tree for both uboot and linux, it is important that the
> serial0 alias points to the console. So some boards reverse those
> aliases. This was reported by Jan Kiszka. The proposed fix was reverting
> the index assignment and going back to the previous iteration.
> 
> However such a reversed assignement (serial0 -> uart1, serial1 -> uart0)
> was already partially broken by the revert (18cc7ac8a28e28). While the
> ttyPS device works, the kmsg connection is already broken and kernel
> messages go missing. Reverting the id assignment does not fix this.
> 
> >From the xilinx_uartps driver pov (after reverting the refactoring
> commits), there can be only one console. This manifests in static
> variables console_pprt and cdns_uart_console. These variables are not
> properly linked and can go out of sync. The cdns_uart_console.index is
> important for uart_add_one_port. We call that function for each port -
> one of which hopefully is the console. If it isn't, the CON_ENABLED flag
> is not set and console_port is cleared. The next cdns_uart_probe call
> then tries to register the next port using that same cdns_uart_console.
> 
> It is important that console_port and cdns_uart_console (and its index
> in particular) stay in sync. The index assignment implemented by
> Shubhrajyoti Datta is correct in principle. It just may have to happen a
> second time if the first cdns_uart_probe call didn't encounter the
> console device. And we shouldn't change the index once the console uart
> is registered.
> 
> Reported-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/f4092727-d8f5-5f91-2c9f-76643aace993@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> Fixes: 18cc7ac8a28e28 ("Revert "serial: uartps: Register own uart console and driver structures"")
> Fixes: 2ae11c46d5fdc4 ("tty: xilinx_uartps: Fix missing id assignment to the console")
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

What tree/branch is this against?  It doesn't seem to apply to my
tty-linus branch which is where I would think it should go to, right?

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux