RE: [PATCH] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: minimum baud rate support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 4:23 PM
> To: Vabhav Sharma (OSS) <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: jslaby@xxxxxxxx; linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: minimum baud rate support
> 
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:12:54AM +0000, Vabhav Sharma (OSS) wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 3:34 PM
> > > To: Vabhav Sharma (OSS) <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: jslaby@xxxxxxxx; linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>; Vabhav
> Sharma
> > > <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: minimum baud rate
> > > support
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:19:05PM +0530, Vabhav Sharma wrote:
> > > > From: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The formula for the baud rate is
> > > > baud rate = "baud clock / ((OSR+1) × SBR)
> > > >
> > > > Algorithm used in function lpuart32_serial_setbrg() only changes
> > > > the SBR. Even with maxmum value put in, OSR stays at 0x7 and the
> > > > lowest baud rate would be ~ 2600 bps
> > > >
> > > > Update the algorithm to allow driver operation at 1200,2400 or
> > > > 600 bps
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 4 ++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > > > b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c index 90298c4..0fd0fa5f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c
> > > > @@ -1925,6 +1925,10 @@ static void __lpuart32_serial_setbrg(struct
> > > uart_port *port,
> > > >  			tmp_sbr++;
> > > >  		}
> > > >
> > > > +		if (tmp_sbr > UARTBAUD_SBR_MASK) {
> > > > +			continue;
> > > > +		}
> > >
> > > Always use scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patches so you do not get
> > > grumpy emails from maintainers telling you to use
> > > scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patches...
> > Indeed, I run the script before sending patch ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > 0001-tty-serial-fsl_lpuart-minimum-baud-rate-support.patch
> > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 10 lines checked
> >
> > 0001-tty-serial-fsl_lpuart-minimum-baud-rate-support.patch has no
> obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
> 
> Ok, then something is wrong as there is obviously a coding style issue with
> your submission, as you can see with a manual review of it, right?
> 
> greg k-h
I see, Unnecessary usage of brace for single statement.
Thank you




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux