Hi, On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:16 PM Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As the commit 677fe555cbfb ("serial: imx: Fix recursive locking bug") > has mentioned the uart driver might cause recursive locking between > normal printing and the kernel debugging facilities (e.g. sysrq and > oops). In the commit it gave out suggestion for fixing recursive > locking issue: "The solution is to avoid locking in the sysrq case > and trylock in the oops_in_progress case." > > This patch follows the suggestion (also used the exactly same code with > other serial drivers, e.g. amba-pl011.c) to fix the recursive locking > issue, this can avoid stuck caused by deadlock and print out log for > sysrq and oops. > > Fixes: 04896a77a97b ("msm_serial: serial driver for MSM7K onboard serial peripheral.") > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > index 3657a24913fc..889538182e83 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > @@ -1576,6 +1576,7 @@ static void __msm_console_write(struct uart_port *port, const char *s, > int num_newlines = 0; > bool replaced = false; > void __iomem *tf; > + int locked = 1; > > if (is_uartdm) > tf = port->membase + UARTDM_TF; > @@ -1588,7 +1589,13 @@ static void __msm_console_write(struct uart_port *port, const char *s, > num_newlines++; > count += num_newlines; > > - spin_lock(&port->lock); > + if (port->sysrq) > + locked = 0; > + else if (oops_in_progress) > + locked = spin_trylock(&port->lock); > + else > + spin_lock(&port->lock); I don't have tons of experience with the "msm" serial driver, but the above snippet tickled a memory in my brain for when I was looking at the "qcom_geni" serial driver, which is a close cousin. I seemed to remember that the "if (port->sysrq)" was something you didn't want. ...but maybe that's only if you do something like commit 336447b3298c ("serial: qcom_geni_serial: Process sysrq at port unlock time")? Any way you can try making a similar change to the msm driver and see if it allow you to remove the special case for "port->sysrq"? -Doug