Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] tty: serial: qcom_geni_serial: Remove sysfs file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/16/2019 1:15 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Akash Asthana (2019-11-15 01:57:48)
On 11/14/2019 11:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Please update the subject. This patch does more than remove the sysfs
file. "Move loopback support to TIOCM_LOOP"?
Ok, I will update this in next version.
Quoting Akash Asthana (2019-11-13 02:49:21)
Remove code from the driver that create and maintain loopback sysfs node.
Instead use the ioctl TIOCMSET with TIOCM_LOOP argument to set HW to
loopback mode.

Signed-off-by: Akash Asthana <akashast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in V5:
   - As per Greg's and Stephen's comment on v4 patch, removed loopback sysfs
     file related code.

   drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c | 30 ++++--------------------------
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
index 56dad67..52f5ea2 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.c
@@ -238,10 +214,14 @@ static void qcom_geni_serial_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *uport,
                                                          unsigned int mctrl)
   {
          u32 uart_manual_rfr = 0;
+       struct qcom_geni_serial_port *port = to_dev_port(uport, uport);
if (uart_console(uport))
                  return;
+ if (mctrl & TIOCM_LOOP)
+               port->loopback = MAX_LOOPBACK_CFG;
How does this work? The loopback is supposed to be the max all the time
and not match some qup number or something?
port->loopback is unrelated to QUP number. However we have different
modes to run loopback test, 1(rx-tx sorted), 2(cts-rts sorted),

3 or Max(rx-tx sorted and cts-rts sorted). In our internal testing we
only use mode 3 hence we are initializing port->loopback variable

to 3 and eventually it will be written to HW register from set_termios
call.
Ok. Thanks for clarifying. Can you rename this macro to
RX_TX_CTS_RTS_SORTED? I imagine seeing something like:

	/* SE_UART_LOOPBACK_CFG */
	#define RX_TX_SORTED		BIT(0)
	#define CTS_RTS_SORTED		BIT(1)
	#define RX_TX_CTS_RTS_SORTED	RX_TX_SORTED | CTS_RTS_SORTED

or whatever the bit field names really are.
Ok, I will update this is v6.

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,\na Linux Foundation Collaborative Project




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux