Hi all,
Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:47:50
+0100 (CET):
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >> I was not sure if this should have been two different patch, but since
> >> this will be fixing the same problem so it seems its better to have them
> >> in a single patch.
> >>
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/{samsung.c => samsung_mtd.c} | 0
> >> drivers/tty/serial/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> drivers/tty/serial/{samsung.c => samsung_tty.c} | 0
> >> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> rename drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/{samsung.c => samsung_mtd.c} (100%)
> >> rename drivers/tty/serial/{samsung.c => samsung_tty.c} (100%)
> >
> > I can take this in the tty tree if the mtd maintainer gives an ack for
> > it...
>
> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
If it is not too late, I am not a big fan of the new naming which is
rather not descriptive. Files in the onenand subdirectory are:
* onenand_<something>.c for the base files
* <vendor>.c for the vendors files (currently: omap2.c and samsung.c).
What about doing the MTD changes in a single patch and renaming both
vendor drivers (for the same reason): onenand_omap2.c and
onenand_samsung.c? I know it makes git blaming more difficult though.
Thanks,
Miquèl
