On 11/15/19 2:01 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
That would be a separate patch, this patch is only concerned with eliminating the implicit assumption of the host being big-endian. And there's already been some pushback to adding arch-specific ifdefs (which I agree with, but as I responded there see as the lesser evil), so unless there's a very good reason to add that complexity, I'd rather not.
We don't want to encourage people to introduce device trees that don't have the brg-frequency property in them.
