On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 16:37, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:20:14 +0200
> Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > + d = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*d), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > &pdev->dev => dev
>
> will change.
>
> >
> > > + if (!d)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + sk = kzalloc(sizeof(*sk), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > any reason not to devm_kzalloc this as well? Then you won't need to
> > manually free it in the error cases.
>
> it has different life time than the device, so it may not allocated
> via devm_kzalloc
>
> > > +static int ioc3kbd_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ioc3kbd_data *d = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +
> > > + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, d->irq, d);
> > > + serio_unregister_port(d->kbd);
> > > + serio_unregister_port(d->aux);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > and on that topic, won't you need to kfree d->kbd and d->aux here?
>
> that's done in serio_release_port() by the serio core.
i see. But in that case, don't the kfree's after the
serio_unregister_port's in the error path of the .probe function cause
a double free?
Regards
Jonas
