Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] serial: 8250: Don't check for mctrl_gpio_init() returning -ENOSYS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:15:55PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:04:11AM +0000, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
> > From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Now that the mctrl_gpio code returns NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS)
> > if CONFIG_GPIOLIB is disabled, we can safely remove this check.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> @greg: This patch doesn't depend on patch 2; ditto for patch 3. So only
> taking patches 1, 3 and 4 should be fine. This way Frieder's v4 only
> have to care for patch 2. (Assuming noone objects to 1, 3 and 4 of
> course.)

Sounds good, I'll do that, thanks.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux