On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:13:05AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 11.06.19 16:48, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > On 11.06.19 14:44, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> >
> > > > > static inline void serial8250_out_MCR(struct uart_8250_port *up, int value)
> > > > > {
> > > > > serial_out(up, UART_MCR, value);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (up->gpios) {
> > > > > + int mctrl_gpio = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (value & UART_MCR_RTS)
> > > > > + mctrl_gpio |= TIOCM_RTS;
> > > > > + if (value & UART_MCR_DTR)
> > > > > + mctrl_gpio |= TIOCM_DTR;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mctrl_gpio_set(up->gpios, mctrl_gpio);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > }
> >
> > > > > static inline int serial8250_in_MCR(struct uart_8250_port *up)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - return serial_in(up, UART_MCR);
> > > > > + int mctrl;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mctrl = serial_in(up, UART_MCR);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (up->gpios) {
> > > > > + int mctrl_gpio = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /* save current MCR values */
> > > > > + if (mctrl & UART_MCR_RTS)
> > > > > + mctrl_gpio |= TIOCM_RTS;
> > > > > + if (mctrl & UART_MCR_DTR)
> > > > > + mctrl_gpio |= TIOCM_DTR;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mctrl_gpio = mctrl_gpio_get_outputs(up->gpios, &mctrl_gpio);
> > > > > + if (mctrl_gpio & TIOCM_RTS)
> > > > > + mctrl |= UART_MCR_RTS;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + mctrl &= ~UART_MCR_RTS;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (mctrl_gpio & TIOCM_DTR)
> > > > > + mctrl |= UART_MCR_DTR;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + mctrl &= ~UART_MCR_DTR;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return mctrl;
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > These are using OR logic with potentially volatile data. Shouldn't we mask
> > > > unused bits in UART_MCR in case of up->gpios != NULL?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't see, which bits you are referring to? Could you please be
> > > a bit more specific with the variable / macro meant (example)?
> >
> > I meant that we double write values in the out() which might have some
> > consequences, though I hope nothing wrong with it happens.
>
> Where is the double write to a register? Sorry, I fail to spot it.
Not to the one register. From the functional point of view the same signal is
set up twice: once per UART register, once per GPIO pins.
> > In the in() we read the all bits in the register.
> >
> > As now I look at the implementation of mctrl_gpio_get_outputs(),
> > I think we rather get helpers for conversion between TIOCM and UART_MCR values,
> > so, they can be used in get_mctrl() / set_mctrl() and above.
>
> Do you something like this in mind?
More likely
static inline int serial8250_MCR_to_TIOCM(int mcr)
{
int tiocm = 0;
if (mcr & ...)
tiocm |= ...;
...
return tiocm;
}
static inline int serial8250_TIOCM_to_MCR(int tiocm)
{
... in a similar way ...
}
> Plus the use of these macros in this patch of course.
No macros, please.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
