Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Looks like Paul has so far only tested this with BBL + FSBL, so I think >> I'll wait to hear from him how that setup might be different from using >> OpenSBI + u-boot. > > I'd recommend testing the DT patches with BBL and the open-source FSBL. > That's the traditional way of booting RISC-V Linux systems. OK, but as you know, not the tradiaional way of booting most other linux systems. ;) I'm working on getting RISC-V supported in kernelCI in a fully-automated way, and I don't currently have the time to add add support for BBL+FSBL to kernelCI automation tooling, so having u-boot support is the best way to get support in kernelCI, IMO. Kevin
