On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 10:29 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 18/03/2019 19:42, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Erin, > > > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > > > > [auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next] > > [also build test ERROR on v5.1-rc1 next-20190318] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Erin-Lo/arm64-dts-Add-Mediatek-SoC-MT8183-and-evaluation-board-dts-and-Makefile/20190318-170422 > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next > > config: arm64-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0 > > reproduce: > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > GCC_VERSION=7.2.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64 > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > In file included from arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-evb.dts:9:0: > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi:8:10: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/mt8183-clk.h: No such file or directory > > #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8183-clk.h> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > compilation terminated. > > > > vim +8 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi > > > > > 8 #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8183-clk.h> > > 9 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > > 10 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> > > 11 > > > > Stephen queued the corresponding patch for v5.2. > I propose we wait for v5.2-rc1 and then apply the basic support and the others > based on this one. > > Erin: There are may mt8183 dts patches floating around that depend on this or > more patches. Can you coordinate with your colleagues to resend them as a > series? Then it will be easier for me to take them for v5.3, as some have > dependencies on other series etc. > > Thanks a lot. > Matthias OK, I will coordinate with my colleagues to resend mt8183 dts patches as a series base on v5.2-rc1 when v5.2-rc1 release. Since we want to send this series more confident so they still send separate patch in v5.1 just for review in advance. Is that ok for you?
