On 10/17/2018 4:32 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:21:08 -0600 Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/17/2018 4:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:03:10 +0200 Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
This should have Arnd's Signed-off-by: as well.
I'm just interested to know, why?
So that Arnd certifies that
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
and all the other stuff in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
section 11!
Also, because section 12 says so :) And that final sentence is, I
believe, appropriate.
Ah, interesting. I see that the documentation was updated since I was
told last year in the same situation by a different maintainer that
co-authors should not have SOB lines on the patch.
Good to know. Thanks for illuminating me.
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
