Re: Status of BOTHER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of BOTHER
From: Alan Cox <alan@llwyncelyn.cymru>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 00:02:20 +0100
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <56ef1679-d6b6-164d-e063-d27241396905@zytor.com>
Organization: is over-rated
References: <56ef1679-d6b6-164d-e063-d27241396905@zytor.com>

Alpha follows the OSF/1 ABI. I am not sure how that is meant to work so I
never added it.

There's also some discussion of this stuff in Debian bugs


https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683826

References:
- Status of BOTHER
  - From: H. Peter Anvin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] serial: sh-sci: Fix earlycon on Renesas ARM platforms
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tty: wipe buffer if not echoing data
Previous by thread: Re: Status of BOTHER
Next by thread: Re: Status of BOTHER
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux PPP] [Linux FS] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Linmodem] [Device Mapper] [Linux Kernel for ARM]

Powered by Linux