On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:00:42AM -0700, QIANJUN wrote: > spin_lock instead of spin_lock_irqsave in imx uart interuput What does that mean? > >From 6580790d7be51a78d1376b90df49b04019a1f944 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: jun qian <hangdianqj@xxxxxxx> > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 06:58:35 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] before the programe into the uart interuput's handler, the > system has already disabled the local cpu interuput. so the spin_lock > interface is More suitable for here. Why is this here? The changelog text belongs in the changelog, not in the subject line :( can you fix this all up and resend? thanks, greg k-h
