On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:55:14PM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote: > On Saturday, July 28, 2018 1, Greg KH wrote: > > > > In your opinion, which one would be better (revert or rebase)? > > > > > > [looking at the incremental differences] > > > > > > I think the easiest for Greg is to rebase, and send 3 patches: > > > > Greg does not rebase his public trees. Nor should anyone else :) > > > > I can revert patches if you want me to, just let me know what ones. Or > > send incremental patches on top of my tree please. But no reverts are > > going to be happening. s/no reverts/no rebases/ ? > > Yesterday I sent a new patch series that will apply on top of the > current tty-next and basically reverts what I did and replaces it with a > new version that incorporates Geert's suggestions. So no reverts are > needed. > > I assume now I'm just waiting to see if Geert has any feedback on the > new series. > > Chris > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
