> After discussion in mailing list, … Thanks that you extended the commit description with a bit of background information. > These two unnecessary NULL checks were tracked in the call > chain as never NULL, … I find this wording too generic. How do you think about to point the function(s) out exactly which call the discussed function implementations? > No functional changes are intended. Did we agree already that such an information could be questionable? https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<e456697b-c412-4de6-a1dd-95ec4a219c68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Is another approach needed to achieve the desired consensus? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
