On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:07:20AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > The tty-driver open routine is mandatory, but the serdev >> > tty-port-controller implementation did not treat it as such and would >> > instead fall back to calling tty_port_open() directly. >> >> The idea was to eventually get rid of the tty_struct dependency and >> only depend on tty_port. That's very invasive though and needs various >> pieces of tty_struct to move into tty_port. >> >> Of course, tty_port_open itself would have to change as well, so this >> change doesn't really matter. > > So are you acking these patches? Yeah, I guess. I was mainly trying to give some background on why it was done the way it was. For both: Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
