On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:07:20AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The tty-driver open routine is mandatory, but the serdev > > tty-port-controller implementation did not treat it as such and would > > instead fall back to calling tty_port_open() directly. > > The idea was to eventually get rid of the tty_struct dependency and > only depend on tty_port. That's very invasive though and needs various > pieces of tty_struct to move into tty_port. > > Of course, tty_port_open itself would have to change as well, so this > change doesn't really matter. So are you acking these patches? confused, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
