Re: [PATCH RFC] serial: Don't call .start_tx if there is nothing to be sent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 08:49:55PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> When an i.MX UART is opened in RS485 for reading only the serial core
> still calls uart_start at times which then calls .start_tx. In the i.MX
> case start_tx then asserts RTS to prepare sending data and only at the
> end notices that there is nothing to send and deassert RTS again. In the
> mean time some data sent to the i.MX might already be missed or damaged.
> 
> Instead of fixing that in the driver, do it in the framework instead for
> other drivers to benefit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> whenever I touch the serial core I feel that I don't understand all the
> interaction with the tty layer and the expectations of a driver. Is
> there something else that .start_tx is supposed to do such that it might
> make sense to call it even though the fifo is empty?
> 
> Looking at atmel_serial.c I think it suffers the same problem because
> there the receiver is disabled, too, without first checking if there is
> something to send. So maybe I really miss something?
> 
> On the bright side: With this change I can transmit data in both
> directions with my rs485 test setup between an i.MX6 and an i.MX25.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index b4613aaf7a11..8ac2c1467a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ static void __uart_start(struct tty_struct *tty)
>  	struct uart_state *state = tty->driver_data;
>  	struct uart_port *port = state->uart_port;
>  
> -	if (port && !uart_tx_stopped(port))
> +	if (port && !uart_tx_stopped(port) &&
> +	    (port->x_char || !uart_circ_empty(&port->state->xmit)))
>  		port->ops->start_tx(port);
>  }
>  

Have you tested this with other serial port devices?  Why check for
x_char?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux