On 14/09/2017 at 09:41, romain izard wrote: > 2017-09-13 19:03 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 13/09/2017 at 14:29:35 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> On 08/09/2017 at 17:35, Romain Izard wrote: >>>> From: Romain Izard <romain.izard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Save and restore the System Clock and Programmable Clock register for >>>> the backup use case. >>> >>> "System Clock" seems to be handled in another patch. >>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 5 +++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c >>>> index 07dc2861ad3f..5421b03553ec 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c >>>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static struct >>>> u32 pcr[PMC_MAX_IDS]; >>>> u32 audio_pll0; >>>> u32 audio_pll1; >>>> + u32 pckr[3]; >>> >>> Some products have different numbers of PCK (only 2 on at91sam9x5 for >>> instance)... >>> >> >> My opinion is that it will be time to change that when multiple SoCs will >> need to save their registers. >> > For the next version, I'll add a #define. But as this code requires a > device tree node with the compatible string "atmel,sama5d2-pmc", I believe > that we can ignore other chips for now. Fair enough, let's go for this. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
