2017-09-13 19:03 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 13/09/2017 at 14:29:35 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 08/09/2017 at 17:35, Romain Izard wrote: >> > From: Romain Izard <romain.izard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Save and restore the System Clock and Programmable Clock register for >> > the backup use case. >> >> "System Clock" seems to be handled in another patch. >> >> > Signed-off-by: Romain Izard <romain.izard.pro@xxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 5 +++++ >> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c >> > index 07dc2861ad3f..5421b03553ec 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c >> > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c >> > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static struct >> > u32 pcr[PMC_MAX_IDS]; >> > u32 audio_pll0; >> > u32 audio_pll1; >> > + u32 pckr[3]; >> >> Some products have different numbers of PCK (only 2 on at91sam9x5 for >> instance)... >> > > My opinion is that it will be time to change that when multiple SoCs will > need to save their registers. > For the next version, I'll add a #define. But as this code requires a device tree node with the compatible string "atmel,sama5d2-pmc", I believe that we can ignore other chips for now. -- Romain Izard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
