Re: [PATCH 2/2] printk/console: Enhance the check for consoles using init memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2017-07-27 18:51:01, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (07/27/17 11:29), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Thanks for the review. I am going to push the two patches into
> > for-4.14 branch so that we could get some testing via linux-next.
> 
> good. agree.
> 
> how do you think,
> 
> would pr_warn() be enough for people to notice the wrongdoing or
> shall we put WARN_ON() there for a while at least? (assuming that
> people pay more attention to backtraces).

I would keep pr_warn(). The warning is interesting only when people
want to debug and the real console does not appear in time.
Then this will be the last but one message on the early console.

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux