Re: Q: what is the need for console write callback if there is serial tx (start_tx) ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:50 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 23:19:51 +0300, Ran Shalit said:
>
>> Isn't writing to console, the same as outputing chars to serial ?
>
> No.  For instance, consider any laptop where "console" is an LCD screen,
> and if it's recent hardware, there isn't a UART anywhere in the device, nor
> is there a serial port to connect to.  Or any system where virtual terminals
> are in the config, for that matter.
>
> Then there's netconsole, console-over-USB, and heaven knows what other
> variations.
>
> See Documentation/console/console.txt  for more information.
>

Hi,

I seen in kernel tty drivers examples where there are both callback
for serial (start_tx, etc) , and for console (register_console).
I am not sure what reason for having a driver support both console and
serial. when there is serail it means there is a uart consoller,
according to my understand the console routine also implement put_char
with the same uart console (not graphic display for example), so it
seems like duplication. I am probably miss understand something.

Thanks you,
Ran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux