On 2016-02-18 11:26:12 [-0600], Josh Cartwright wrote: > The use of IRQF_ONESHOT when registering an interrupt handler with > request_irq() is non-sensical. > > Not only that, it also prevents the handler from being threaded when it > otherwise should be w/ IRQ_FORCED_THREADING is enabled. This causes the > following deadlock observed by Sean Nyekjaer on -rt: So we this patch http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1602.2/02637.html sitting in -RT. Then someone posted http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg14975.html which depends on it. Before I was are of the first patch, I posted http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg14666.html and nobody seems to care if anything of this gets merged upstream where it belongs. Could some please carry this to Greg upstream? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
