The fifo mask functions should be static as they are not
used outside of the driver. Fix the following warnings by
making them static:
drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h:109:5: warning: symbol 'uart_usp_ff_full_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h:117:5: warning: symbol 'uart_usp_ff_empty_mask' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-serial@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h b/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
index c3a885b..43756bd 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sirfsoc_uart.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct sirfsoc_uart_register {
enum sirfsoc_uart_type uart_type;
};
-u32 uart_usp_ff_full_mask(struct uart_port *port)
+static u32 uart_usp_ff_full_mask(struct uart_port *port)
{
u32 full_bit;
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ u32 uart_usp_ff_full_mask(struct uart_port *port)
return (1 << full_bit);
}
-u32 uart_usp_ff_empty_mask(struct uart_port *port)
+static u32 uart_usp_ff_empty_mask(struct uart_port *port)
{
u32 empty_bit;
--
2.8.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
