> Пятница, 8 апреля 2016, 11:57 +03:00 от Micka <mickamusset@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Thank you Alexander for taking time,
>
> Well I'm not an expert, so correct me If I'm wrong: but if I'm using
> the clock node with fixed-clock property, therefore this function will
> be called :
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(s->clk)
>
> That the part that I don't like, or I don't need. I don't want the
> processor to create a clock and use ressources for an unused clock.
> The clock node is good when you want your processor to generate the
> clock, but in my case, I don't need it.
clk_prepare_enable() do nothing for fixed clock.
CLK framework is more flexible, so I still believe that the introduction of an
additional parameter is unnecessary and only clutter the code.
---
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��ǫ����{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
