Re: [PATCH v7] serial: support for 16550A serial ports on LP-8x4x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 13:06 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 00:26 +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > The patch adds support for 3 additional LP-8x4x built-in serial
> > ports.
> > 
> > The device can also host up to 8 extension cards with 4 serial
> > ports
> > on each card for a total of 35 ports. However, I don't have
> > the hardware to test extension cards, so they are not supported,
> > yet.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Few more comments, mostly about style.
> 
> > +static void lp8841_serial_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
> > +		struct ktermios *termios, struct ktermios *old)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef BOTHER
> > +	unsigned int cbaud;
> > +#endif
> > +	unsigned int baud;
> > +	unsigned int len;
> 
> Since you are writing this to the register at the end maybe 
>  - unsigned int -> u8 (write*b* — exactly one byte)
>  - len -> value (it's not only about data length)
> 
> > +	unsigned int old_csize = old ? old->c_cflag & CSIZE : CS8;
> > +	struct lp8841_serial_data *data = port->private_data;
> > +
> > +	/* We only support CS7 and CS8 */
> > +	while ((termios->c_cflag & CSIZE) != CS7 &&
> > +	       (termios->c_cflag & CSIZE) != CS8) {
> > +		termios->c_cflag &= ~CSIZE;
> > +		termios->c_cflag |= old_csize;
> > +		old_csize = CS8;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	serial8250_do_set_termios(port, termios, old);
> > +
> > +	if ((termios->c_cflag & CSIZE) == CS7)
> > +		len = 9;
> > +	else
> > +		len = 10;
> > +
> > +	if (termios->c_cflag & CSTOPB)
> > +		len++;
> 
> > +	if (termios->c_cflag & PARENB)
> > +		len++;
> > +	if (!(termios->c_cflag & PARODD))
> > +		len++;
> > +#ifdef CMSPAR
> > +	if (termios->c_cflag & CMSPAR)
> > +		len++;
> > +#endif
> 
> I don't know if someone likes it or not (up to you), but for me looks
> better to have ternary operators here:
> 
> value += (termios->c_cflag & CSTOPB) ? 1 : 0;
> value += (termios->c_cflag & PARENB) ? 1 : 0;
> value += (termios->c_cflag & PARODD) ? 0 : 1;
> 
> #ifdef CMSPAR
> value += (termios->c_cflag & CMSPAR) ? 1 : 0;
> #endif
> 
> > +	len -= 9;
> 
> This one could be part of previous evaluation:
>  value = (termios->c_cflag & CSIZE) == CS7 ? 0 : 1;

Great point.

> > +	len &= 3;
> > +	len <<= 3;
> 
> Perhaps to define magic number (e.g. LP8841_DATA_LEN_SHIFT).

OK

> > +
> > +	baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(termios);
> > +
> > +#ifdef BOTHER
> > +	/* We only support fixed rates */
> > +	cbaud = termios->c_cflag & CBAUD;
> > +
> > +	if (cbaud == BOTHER) {
> > +		termios->c_cflag &= ~BOTHER;
> > +
> > +		/* Don't rewrite B0 */
> > +		if (baud) {
> > +			tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios,
> > baud,
> > baud);
> > +			baud = tty_termios_baud_rate(termios);
> > +
> > +			/* Set sane default speed if we get 0 */
> > +			if (!baud) {
> > +				baud = 9600;
> 
> > +				tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termi
> > os
> > ,
> > +						baud, baud);
> 
> I think you can call this unconditionally together with case >
> 115200.

The calls are orthogonal. This one deals with the case when BOTHER is
defined and set, and we have non-zero rate with BOTHER, but we have
zero rate after BOTHER is cleared. So we set 9600 as a sane default
speed.

> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +	/* We only support up to 115200 */
> > +	if (baud > 115200) {
> > +		baud = 115200;
> > +		tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios, baud, baud);
> > +	}

This one deals with the case when the rate is over 115200. If the
previous case has been triggered, this one won't be.

> Btw, can we use uart_get_baud_rate() here?

uart_get_baud_rate() has already been called
in serial8250_do_set_termios(). uart_get_baud_rate()
calls tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(). uart_get_baud_rate() won't help
us if BOTHER is set. Once BOTHER is cleared, we don't need any special
processing of uart_get_baud_rate().

> > +static int lp8841_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +     struct uart_8250_port uart = {};
> 
> {0}

---
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lp8841.c: In function 'lp8841_serial_probe':
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lp8841.c:124:32: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
  struct uart_8250_port uart = {0};
                                ^
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_lp8841.c:124:32: note: (near initialization for 'uart.port.lock.<anonymous>.rlock.raw_lock')
---

Zero triggers a warning. I'll use memset().

> > +     struct lp8841_serial_data *data;
> > +     struct resource *mmres, *mires;
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     mmres = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> 
> > +     mires = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> 
> Perhaps move it down to be closer to devm_ioremap_resource() call.

OK

Thanks for lightning fast reviews. I'll resubmit v8 if there is no
objections to the points above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux