Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>There was some disagreement about the usage of
>access_32b vs uap->port.iotype for determining whether we need 32-bit
>accessors or not.
There was? I missed that, please send follow-on patches to resolve the
issue if there is one.
I can submit a patch that provides an alternative implementation, but
I'm pretty sure Russell won't like it.
For reference:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg19710.html
Russell said that UPIO_MEM is supposed to be literally only 8-bit
access, but then Peter Hurley posted this:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg19930.html
which you applied. So my patch would remove access_32b and use
UPIO_MEM32/UPIO_MEM instead. It would be a little weird having both
patches in your tree, I guess.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
