On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:21:00 PM Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:21:47AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:38:50 AM Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > > In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
> > > if we are probing from ACPI use this mode.
[cut]
> > > + uap->clk = devm_clk_get(&dev->dev, NULL);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(uap->clk))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(uap->clk);
> > > +
> > > + uap->vendor = vendor;
> > > + uap->lcrh_rx = vendor->lcrh_rx;
> > > + uap->lcrh_tx = vendor->lcrh_tx;
> > > + uap->fifosize = vendor->get_fifosize(dev);
> > > + uap->port.ops = &amba_pl011_pops;
> > > + snprintf(uap->type, sizeof(uap->type), "PL011 rev%u",
> > > + amba_rev(dev));
> > > + } else {
> > > + uap->vendor = &vendor_sbsa;
> > > + uap->fifosize = 32;
> > > + uap->port.ops = &sbsa_uart_pops;
> > > + uap->fixed_baud = 115200;
> > > +
> > > + snprintf(uap->type, sizeof(uap->type), "SBSA");
> >
> > This looks sort of heavy-handed.
> >
> > Is this the only possible configuration of the device in the ACPI case?
> >
>
> As far as I can tell yes, but ARM haven't actually published a document
> to state that as fact.
At least a comment explaining what kind of information this is based on would
be useful. Otherwise one has to wonder where this is coming from.
> This does replace the platform_probe that Russel was unhappy about for
> the ACPI case.
I can't really comment on that.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
