Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI: scan add call to probe amba devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:16:53AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:38:49 AM Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > Call the amba device creation function in the default enumeration path,
> > this is the same location platform devices are probed.
> 
> First, I'm sorry for the glacially slow response here.
> 
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index f834b8c..aa3184e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -1633,8 +1633,10 @@ static void acpi_default_enumeration(struct acpi_device *device)
> >  	acpi_dev_get_resources(device, &resource_list, acpi_check_spi_i2c_slave,
> >  			       &is_spi_i2c_slave);
> >  	acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> > -	if (!is_spi_i2c_slave)
> > +	if (!is_spi_i2c_slave) {
> > +		acpi_create_amba_device(device);
> 
> Do you really have to add this here?
> 
> It would be much cleaner to use a new scan handler instead.
> 

I can certainly look into doing that, I cannot from a quick scan see any
reason not too. I just didn't think of it.

Graeme

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux PPP]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linmodem]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Kernel for ARM]

  Powered by Linux