2015-10-24 5:54 GMT+08:00 Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I am not sure the silicon designer's plan on the UART IP. Different >> silicon team have different decision on the IP choice. So I guess >> future ZTE SOC may reuse ZTE UART per people assignment. > > I would rather see this as a separate driver. I think this patch > pollutes the amba-pl011.c driver too much. I am OK to add a new driver for ZTE UART if no other's objection though I do not agree you. Without this last patch, other patches are just for minor refactor for register access. Comment from any other is welcome. Jun > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
