Hello Nicolas
>
> I have the feeling that moving the code chunk that uses this new
> variable (rs485_enabled) here ...
>
>> ret = uart_add_one_port(&atmel_uart, &port->uart);
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_add_port;
>> @@ -2574,7 +2572,7 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
>>
>> - if (port->uart.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) {
>> + if (rs485_enabled) {
>> UART_PUT_MR(&port->uart, ATMEL_US_USMODE_NORMAL);
>> UART_PUT_CR(&port->uart, ATMEL_US_RTSEN);
>> }
>
> ... (this one ^^^) up where you can test the SER_RS485_ENABLED, can be
> even simpler.
>
> otherwise, it seems good so you can add my:
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
I supposed that the code needs to be initialized with rs485 disabled
and then enable it. Also I did not want to change the behaviour a
driver in a patch that involves 3 other drivers. If you don't mind I
prefer that this is added to a separated patch.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
