> I really don't like the way that the tty core has been changed to handle > multiple attribute groups, as I feel tty drivers shouldn't be creating > "special" sysfs files, depending on what driver is bound to them. The intent isn't that it is "special" but that it can be propogated to others as and when they wish to provide it. > Usually we have handled this using tools like 'stty' and ioctls, right? > Surely there is an ioctl to control the interrupt level, right? Hasn't > this been covered before somehow? No, and the direction when this started was to use sysfs as we have also been moving all the other attributes towards sysfs and has been since 2012. TTY devices do have lots of strange attributes and right now many of them are only programmable by using device tree and rebooting. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
